Apr 09, 2022
In Hydrogen on demand
Does the word "philosopher" conjure up images of a meditation master sitting cross-legged on a barren hilltop? Or, maybe you've ever taken a philosophy class, so you know what philosophy is, but you're a little vague about how it's useful . You realize it's fun to ask deep questions and think hard - especially if that happens in a bar. Photo Credit: Soda Guide But what can a philosopher actually do for you and your business? I will explain. But I'll start by mentioning that I'm both a philosopher and a content writer. Are you skeptical when email marketing companies promote email marketing? If so, you might doubt the value of Philosopher Content Writers promoting Philosopher Content Writers. That's great! I invite you to read the following with skeptical glasses. here we go. Five reasons why your content writer should be a philosopher too… (1) Philosophers are experts in reasoning. We are trained to build parameters that behave like well-behaved machines. Sometimes these machines are very complex with many different parts. In general, though, machines industry mailing list designed to take input of truths (premises) and hand out shiny new truths (conclusions). Certain arguments are designed to exempt conclusions that are only likely to be true. The type of output depends on the constructed parameter types. When you publish content, your credibility is at stake. So you need it to be true, and you need it to make well-supported claims. You can read and view course materials for free. There is a fee if you wish to grade coursework and receive a certificate at the end of the course. (2) Philosophers evaluate the reasoning of others. In addition to constructing our own arguments in search of truth, philosophers also ask whether other people's claims are true and adequately supported. Pedantism and morbid questioning are occupational hazards. What exactly is the author's argument? Does it work? Are all the premises true? What background assumptions are being made (explicitly or implicitly)? Do we have the same assumptions? Or should they be protected? Can they defend successfully? What happens if we reject these assumptions?